Gordon Hayward is back in town for Friday’s Jazz-Celtics game. Over a year later, has the sting of his departure subsided?

Is it that he left? Or how he left?

We know this: Gordon Hayward returns to Vivint Arena for the first time on Friday since he left the Utah Jazz over a year ago in what was the most crushing free agent departure in franchise history.

We know that fans are eagerly anticipating the game. Simeon Mismash, a Jazz fan from Sandy who attended Wednesday’s game against the Mavericks, says he’ll be full throat for Hayward’s return.

“I’m gonna boo him, I’m gonna lose my voice — I’m just gonna boo him the whole night when he steps on the court,” Mismash said. “I’m never gonna boo someone as much as Gordon Hayward. Deron Williams … Enes Kanter … Derek Fisher, all of them combined is gonna be Gordon Hayward on Friday.”

Mismash isn’t alone. Utahns, both online and when you ask them in person, still seem sore about Hayward’s departure, even as the 2017-18 team matched the success of the Hayward-led group from the year before.

Hayward expects the booing to come, too. Last week, he told MassLive that “It’s been a year, so hopefully not as vicious a booing, but I’m sure I’ll get booed," Hayward said. “It is what it is.”

But how did we get here?

How he left

Hayward was an All-Star for the Jazz in his final season, leading them to their first playoff appearance in five years, their first playoff win in seven. Jazz assistant coach Johnnie Bryant had worked tirelessly with Hayward to develop his game; meanwhile, head coach Quin Snyder turned his offense into a Hayward-focused laser. By the time free agency rolled around, everyone realized that Hayward was hugely important to the franchise. Fans chanted his name in the playoffs, begging him to stay. They contributed an estimated $50,000 to a billboard campaign, resulting in signs scattered across the valley with #Stayward messages. Elementary and junior high school classes sent Hayward letters, begging that he stay. The community rallied together to keep this one man, the one who had grown up in front of them, in Salt Lake City.

He left.

But what’s remarkable about the Hayward story is that in the eyes of nearly everyone impacted by Hayward’s departure — fans and Jazz leadership alike — what hurt most is not that Hayward chose Boston over Salt Lake City; it was the way he departed.

As Ann Green, a Jazz season ticket-holder from Midvale, said, “I was very disappointed in the manner in which he led us on to believe he was coming back. I was sad, I was mad, I was angry.”

It’s always difficult when a star player leaves in free agency, but recent departures by Paul George, Kawhi Leonard, and Chris Paul from their teams showed just how much the Jazz lost out on by having Hayward wait until the offseason to make a decision. Paul George informed the Indiana Pacers that he planned on departing the franchise the summer before he was to become a free agent, giving them time to get value back for George. They did — acquiring young All-Star Victor Oladipo and sweet-shooting big man Domantas Sabonis from Oklahoma City.

Leonard broke San Antonio hearts when he didn’t play for most of the 2017-18 season, then demanded a trade. But the Spurs acquired an All-Star in return, DeMar DeRozan, in exchange for the final year of Leonard’s contract.

You’ll hear about those examples when you talk to Jazz personnel privately about Hayward’s departure, though there are no guarantees the Jazz would have broken their playoff drought in 2016-17 had Hayward requested a trade like George and Leonard.

But the Paul trade to Houston shows that Hayward had some latitude to help Utah on the way out. Like Hayward, Paul was an upcoming free agent, but had the option to opt in to another year on his contract. In the week before Paul was to become a free agent, Paul informed the Clippers that he wanted to leave to join the Rockets, and the two teams were able to figure out a mutually beneficial trade, including valuable role players and a first-round pick heading to L.A. The trade was completed three days before free agency began.

Two days later, the Jazz traded for Ricky Rubio, but he wasn’t the only point guard the Jazz were considering. Besides the incumbent starter, George Hill, according to multiple Tribune sources, the Jazz spoke extensively to Toronto point guard Kyle Lowry’s representatives about bringing the All-Star point guard to Utah. After those discussions, the Jazz felt confident about their ability to land Lowry, but chose to pull out of any potential deal because signing Lowry would have required cap space earmarked for the Hayward. Lowry signed a new deal with the Raptors on July 3.

On that date, the Jazz were meeting with Hayward in his San Diego home. Jazz owner Gail Miller wrapped up the pitch by asking Hayward point-blank: “Will you stay with us? You know how important you are to our organization.”

Hayward didn’t commit. In fact, in a June interview on Utah Lt. Gov Spencer Cox’s podcast, Miller says Hayward didn’t ever call her, even after making his decision.

“He never did call me,” Miller said. “But I called him. Well, I didn’t call, I texted. We had some good words, and there’s no animosity.”

On Decision Day, more opportunities came and went as the Jazz chased Hayward. After multiple reports, first from ESPN, then The Tribune, indicated that Hayward had chosen the Celtics, the Jazz quickly moved to plan B: a flight planned to make a pitch to Washington Wizards forward Otto Porter. But after agent Mark Bartelstein insisted that Hayward hadn’t made up his mind, Jazz management stayed on the ground.

“We didn’t want to jump on the flight and not being able to communicate,” Lindsey told USA Today. Porter signed an offer sheet with the Brooklyn Nets that day, though the Wizards matched. Later in the afternoon, the Clippers agreed to trade the first-round pick they’d acquired in the Paul trade for Danilo Gallinari, another Jazz small forward target in the case of Hayward’s departure.

Asked about his options at the small forward position on July 6, Lindsey said this: “Getting some wing size and getting that replacement would be very key, but again, there's not as many prospects on the board because of the timing."

The irony is that what looked like a mess at the time turned out just fine for the Jazz. Though Thabo Sefolosha was the Jazz’s major small forward acquisition, Ingles stepped up for the starting small forward minutes. Donovan Mitchell turned out to be a revelation as a rookie, taking over Hayward’s scoring duties. The question still remains about what the Jazz could have done with Hayward in tow, or with assets acquired for him, but overall, things have turned out pretty well.

“The day he made his decision, all of Utah thought the world was going to end. Credit to the organization for being able to bring in pieces last minute with how late it was,” Ingles said. “We’ve been able to build and keep getting better. As an organization and as a player, we’re really happy with where we are.”

What to expect Friday

Despite that, fans on Friday are still expected to do some venting, maybe more offended at what transpired than the end result.

McKay Peck, a Jazz fan from Lehi, said that the manner of Hayward’s departure changed what he’ll be doing on Friday. “If he had left in a good way, I would cheer him for what he did for the franchise, but I will be booing him because of how he left.”

Some fans, like Provo’s Kevin Dix, suggested that the Jazz fans should give Hayward the silent treatment. “I think it would mean more if no one did anything, if it was just silence [rather] than people booing him,” Dix said. “I think that would throw him off more, ’cause he’s expecting the boos.”

“I would give him the silence he gave Gail and the Jazz,” Jazz fan Diana Allen said.

With so many fans committed to booing, a stadium-wide silence isn’t going to happen, and that’s an outcome that will probably please the ESPN cameras and sound engineers. But when asking the Jazz’s players, they’re clear on the subject: while this game might be critical to the fans, it’s not quite as important for them.

Whether it’s because of the time that’s passed since Hayward’s departure (nearly 18 months now), the injury that cost him last season, Hayward’s reduced role as he recovers, or just an embrace of a player’s ability to make decisions for himself in free agency, the players say that they don’t have Friday night circled on their calendars.

“Gordon is a good guy, I think I’m a good guy ... Sometimes you make choices that you think are good for you,” Gobert said. “You don’t have to judge anyone. It’s just a game, and we’re gonna go play basketball.”

Jae Crowder has a unique perspective on the game. Two years ago, Boston fans chanted Hayward’s name when the Jazz were in town, though Crowder played at Hayward’s position for the Celtics at the time. He remembers that game fondly.

“My emotions were very high, I was very upset with the response of my fans in Boston at the time. I played upset, and I played fearless that night. I had a good night on both ends of the court,” Crowder said. “I probably shouldn’t have gone to the media, I probably should have let myself cool down. But I don’t regret anything that happened that night.”

But even for Crowder, he’s thinking about the game as another in the course of the early season. “It’s early in the season right now, and we’re trying to build our habits and start playing the right way. The game is the game,” Crowder said. “We have to focus on ourselves.”

And for the mild-mannered Derrick Favors, it’s even simpler that that. “I texted him after he said he was going to Boston,” Favors said. “We talked a couple times when he played here, but after that, that was it.

"I just moved on.”